27 P.2d 62
No. 3048Supreme Court of Nevada.
December 2, 1933.
OPINION
Per Curiam:
This is a companion matter to that of Jack et al. v. First Judicial District Court, 27 P.2d 61, this day decided. The two matters involve the same facts except as to the bank in question. The two matters were argued and submitted together, at the conclusion of which it was stipulated that an opinion in one of the two matters might control the other.
Page 109
On the authority of the opinion in Jack et al. v. First Judicial District Court, it is ordered that the writ sought be denied, and that these proceedings be and are hereby dismissed.
No. 69065. 132 Nev. Adv. Opn. 80 DAVID JOHN KAPLAN, Appellant, v. CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE,…
No. 69566. 132 Nev. Adv. Opn. 79 ANTHONY MAYO, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT…
No. 69048. 132 Nev. Adv. Opn. 78 PACIFIC WESTERN BANK, A CALIFORNIA BANKING CORPORATION, Petitioner,…
No. 67656. 132 Nev. Adv. Opn. 74 FREDRICK LEWIS BOWMAN, A/K/A FREDERICK LEWIS BOWMAN, Appellant,…
106 P.3d 1269 DARRYL WILLIAMS v. STATE. No. 39177.Supreme Court of Nevada. May 09, 2002.…
Lara v. District Court. No. 46284.Supreme Court of Nevada. March 24, 2006. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This…