502 P.2d 986

RICHARD E. HEINLE, APPELLANT, v. LYANN AILEEN HEINLE, RESPONDENT.

No. 6861Supreme Court of Nevada.
November 16, 1972

Appeal from Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; James J. Guinan, Judge.

Page 589

Fry and Fry, of Reno, for Appellant.

Samuel B. Francovich, of Reno, for Respondent.

OPINION
Per Curiam:

In the circumstances disclosed by the record, we believe the trial court erred neither in its disposition of the parties’ community property, NRS 125.150(1), nor in ordering appellant to pay respondent $75 per month for the support of the parties’ minor daughter, NRS 125.140(2). Recounting those circumstances, which in combination are unique, would create no useful precedent.

Affirmed.

Tagged: