HEINLE v. HEINLE, 88 Nev. 588 (1972)

502 P.2d 986

RICHARD E. HEINLE, APPELLANT, v. LYANN AILEEN HEINLE, RESPONDENT.

No. 6861Supreme Court of Nevada.
November 16, 1972

Appeal from Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; James J. Guinan, Judge.

Page 589

Fry and Fry, of Reno, for Appellant.

Samuel B. Francovich, of Reno, for Respondent.

OPINION
Per Curiam:

In the circumstances disclosed by the record, we believe the trial court erred neither in its disposition of the parties’ community property, NRS 125.150(1), nor in ordering appellant to pay respondent $75 per month for the support of the parties’ minor daughter, NRS 125.140(2). Recounting those circumstances, which in combination are unique, would create no useful precedent.

Affirmed.