RICHARDS v. LINDQUIST, 94 Nev. 163 (1978)

576 P.2d 749

DONNELL RICHARDS, APPELLANT, v. WILHELMINA S. LINDQUIST, RENEE L. KENNEDY, AKA RENEE L. WALDO, AND CHARLES ALDABE, AKA CHARLES D. ALDABE, RESPONDENTS. RENO ESCROW COMPANY, A NEVADA CORPORATION, DONNELL RICHARDS, APPELLANTS, v. WILHELMINA S. LINDQUIST, RENEE L. KENNEDY, ET AL., RESPONDENTS. WILHELMINA S. LINDQUIST AND RENEE L. KENNEDY, H. DALE MURPHY, ESQ., HARRY MULHOLLAND, ESQ., AND ROBERT O. FORT, ESQ., ET AL., THIRD-PARTY RESPONDENTS.

No. 8907Supreme Court of Nevada.
April 6, 1978 Rehearing denied May 17, 1978

Appeal from summary judgment, Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; John E. Gabrielli, Judge.

Page 164

Donnell Richards and Paul A. Richards, Reno, and John Tom Ross, Carson City, for Appellants.

C. Nicholas Pereos, Reno, for Respondents and Third-Party Respondents Lindquist and Kennedy.

Laxalt, Berry Allison, Carson City, for Third-Party Respondent Mulholland.

H. Dale Murphy, Reno, for Third-Party Respondent Murphy.

OPINION
Per Curiam:

In separate actions consolidated for trial, appellant Richards sought to (1) foreclose on a deed of trust securing a promissory note, and (2) set aside a transfer of property allegedly made to defraud creditors. Respondents moved for and were granted summary judgment.

Appellant here contends summary judgment was not proper because numerous issues of material fact are in dispute. Even viewing the record, as we must, in a light most favorable to appellant, we perceive no such dispute in the material facts; accordingly, the district court judgment is affirmed. NRCP 56; Olson v. Iacometti, 91 Nev. 241, 533 P.2d 1360 (1975).

Page 165